The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. Lamar Media Corporation et al
| The Satanic Temple, Inc. |
| Lamar Media Corporation, Lamar Advantage GP Company, LLC, Lamar Advantage Holding Company and Lamar Media Company |
| 5:2022cv05033 |
| February 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #16 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to May 11, 2022. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on April 25, 2022. (jld)
|
|
Filing 16
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction to May 11, 2022 by The Satanic Temple, Inc.. (Kezhaya, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 15
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Hearing set for 6/14/2022 01:30 PM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/20/2022. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on April 14, 2022. (slc)
|
|
Filing 14
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lamar Advantage GP Company, LLC. (Keith-Bolden, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 13
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lamar Media Company. (Keith-Bolden, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 12
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lamar Advantage Holding Company. (Keith-Bolden, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Lamar Advantage GP Company, LLC, Lamar Advantage Holding Company, Lamar Media Company. (Keith-Bolden, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Lamar Advantage GP Company, LLC, Lamar Advantage Holding Company, Lamar Media Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Keith-Bolden, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Keith-Bolden on behalf of Lamar Advantage GP Company, LLC, Lamar Advantage Holding Company, Lamar Media Company. (Keith-Bolden, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or other responsive pleading. New answer deadline is April 12, 2022. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on March 23, 2022. (ee)
|
|
Filing 7
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Amended Complaint,,,, by Lamar Advantage GP Company, LLC, Lamar Advantage Holding Company, Lamar Media Company. (Shannon, Michael)
|
|
Filing 6
THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Lamar Advantage GP Company, LLC, Lamar Advantage Holding Company, Lamar Media Company and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (tg)
|
|
Filing 5
Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished. (lgd)
|
|
Filing 4
THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to Lamar Media Corp.; Lamar Advantage GP Company, LLC; Lamar Advantage Holding Company for service of the following document: #3 Amended Complaint,,,,. (Attachments: #1 Lamar Advantage GP Company LLC, #2 Lamar Advantage Holding Company)(Kezhaya, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 3
AMENDED COMPLAINT as to #2 Complaint,,, against All Defendants [corrected complaint -- the original complaint was the wrong document version], filed by The Satanic Temple, Inc.. Related document: #2 Complaint,,, filed by The Satanic Temple, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit contract, #2 Exhibit informational pamphlet, #3 Exhibit email publicly stating Lamar's copy policy, #4 Exhibit Lamar's copy acceptance policy, #5 Exhibit email from Little Rock office announcing viewpoint discrimination, #6 Exhibit email requesting corporate review of TST's designs, #7 Exhibit email from Fayetteville office announcing viewpoint discrimination, #8 Exhibit second email from Fayetteville office announcing viewpoint discrimination, #9 Exhibit email from corporate rejecting the designs, #10 Exhibit instant message log suggesting Lamar has a general practice of Atheist discrimination, #11 Exhibit demand letter, #12 Exhibit instant message log suggesting TST's copy was rejected in bad faith)(Kezhaya, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2549656), filed by The Satanic Temple, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit contract, #2 Exhibit informational pamphlet, #3 Exhibit email publicly stating Lamar's copy policy, #4 Exhibit Lamarys copy acceptance policy, #5 Exhibit email from Little Rock office announcing viewpoint discrimination, #6 Exhibit email requesting corporate review of TST's designs, #7 Exhibit email from Fayetteville office announcing viewpoint discrimination, #8 Exhibit second email from Fayetteville office announcing viewpoint discrimination, #9 Exhibit email from corporate rejecting the designs, #10 Exhibit instant message log suggesting Lamar has a general practice of Atheist discrimination, #11 Exhibit demand letter, #12 Exhibit instant message log suggesting TST's copy was rejected in bad faith)(Kezhaya, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET by The Satanic Temple, Inc.. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (lgd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
