Cincoski v. Lindsay
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Cincoski
Defendant: Circuit Judge Mark Lindsay
Case Number: 5:2022cv05042
Filed: March 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Timothy L Brooks
Referring Judge: Christy D Comstock
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2022 Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ORDER denying #8 Motion for Reconsideration. To the extent this Motion is construed as late-filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the Court has considered the objections in view of the findings and recommendations in the R&R. The objections lack merit and are overruled. Petitioner has failed to engage substantively with R&R's reasoning, and, therefore, dismissal of the case remains appropriate. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on April 19, 2022. (ee)
April 19, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to reconsider #7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations by Daniel Lee Cincoski. (lgd)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN ITS ENTIRETY. For the reasons stated in #6 Report and Recommendations, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Daniel Lee Cincoski is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on April 18, 2022. (lgd)
March 29, 2022 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Daniel Lee Cincoski. Objections to R&R due by 4/15/2022. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on March 29, 2022. (tg)
March 28, 2022 Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on March 28, 2022. (smg)
March 24, 2022 Filing 4 MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Christy D. Comstock: #3 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Daniel Lee Cincoski. Motions referred to Honorable Christy D. Comstock.(lgd)
March 24, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Daniel Lee Cincoski. (lgd)
March 8, 2022 Filing 2 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished. (lgd) (lgd).
March 8, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Daniel Lee Cincoski.(lgd)
March 8, 2022 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 5.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 3/29/2022 (lgd) Modified on 3/9/2022 (tg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cincoski v. Lindsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Cincoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Circuit Judge Mark Lindsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?