Rausch Coleman Homes NWA, LLC v. Centerton, Arkansas, City of
| Rausch Coleman Homes NWA, LLC |
| Centerton, Arkansas, City of and City of Centerton, Arkansas |
| 5:2022cv05087 |
| May 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/7/2023 09:00 AM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. JURY TRIAL set for 7/17/2023 09:00 AM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on July 8, 2022. (slc) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ORDER Setting Settlement Conference: Settlement Conference set for 8/12/2022 at 09:00 AM in Fayetteville - 2nd flr (Rm 210) before Honorable Christy D. Comstock. Each party shall provide a concise, confidential settlement statement no later than August 5, 2022 via email to CDCSettle@arwd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on July 6, 2022. (bjb) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY Minute Entry for proceedings held before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks: Case Management Hearing held on 7/6/2022. (Paula Barden-Court Reporter) (slc) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ORDER Resetting CASE MANAGEMENT HEARING (TIME ONLY): Case Management Hearing reset for 7/6/2022 09:00 AM before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on July 1, 2022. (slc) |
| Filing 9 PRETRIAL DISCLOSURE SHEET by Rausch Coleman Homes NWA, LLC. (Clark, William) |
| Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by City of Centerton, Arkansas. (Kieklak, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Hearing set for 7/6/2022 10:30 AM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/27/2022. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on May 23, 2022. (slc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda M. LaFever on behalf of City of Centerton, Arkansas. (LaFever, Amanda) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (bjb) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 State Court Complaint by Centerton, Arkansas, City of.(bjb) (lgd). |
| Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Centerton, Arkansas, City of, filed by Rausch Coleman Homes NWA, LLC.(bjb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Benton County Circuit Court, case number 04CV-22-295, filed by Centerton, Arkansas, City of. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(bjb) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by City of Centerton, Arkansas. (bjb) |
| Notice of Removal filing fee paid re Clerk's Notice Regarding Filing Fee,, #2 Notice of Removal : $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2591667.. (Kieklak, Thomas) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 5/13/2022 (bjb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
