Expedited Partners, L.L.C. v. AIM Brands, L.L.C. et al
Plaintiff: Expedited Partners, L.L.C.
Defendant: AIM Brands, L.L.C., Christopher Nowlin and Marcus Gibbs
Case Number: 5:2022cv05207
Filed: October 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Timothy L Brooks
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip Daniel Holland on behalf of Expedited Partners, L.L.C.. (Holland, Philip)
October 12, 2022 Filing 6 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to AIM Brands, L.L.C., Marcus Gibbs, Christopher Nowlin and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (bjb)
October 11, 2022 Filing 5 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to Marcus Gibbs for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Holland, Philip)
October 11, 2022 Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to Christopher Nowlin for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Holland, Philip)
October 11, 2022 Filing 3 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to AIM BRANDS, L.L.C. for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Holland, Philip)
October 11, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Expedited Partners, L.L.C. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2670671), filed by Expedited Partners, L.L.C..(Poynter, Scott)
October 11, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Expedited Partners, L.L.C.. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (tg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Expedited Partners, L.L.C. v. AIM Brands, L.L.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Expedited Partners, L.L.C.
Represented By: Scott E. Poynter
Represented By: Michael B. Phillips
Represented By: Philip Daniel Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AIM Brands, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Nowlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcus Gibbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?