Pulfer v. GEICO General Insurance Company
Alexandria Pulfer |
GEICO General Insurance Company |
5:2022cv05230 |
November 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Timothy L Brooks |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Vo, Caley) |
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Hearing set for 1/27/2023 10:30 AM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/10/2023. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on November 21, 2022. (slc) |
Complaint filing fee paid re Clerk's Notice Regarding Filing Fee,, : $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2690005.. (Vo, Caley) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished. (lgd) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by GEICO General Insurance Company.(lgd) |
Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against GEICO General Insurance Company, filed by Alexandria Pulfer.(lgd) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Washington County Circuit Court, case number 72CV-22-2715., filed by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court documents)(lgd) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by GEICO General Insurance Company. (lgd) |
CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 11/21/2022 (lgd) |
TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE: The following attorney(s) listed on Complaint #3 is (are) not registered for CM/ECF noticing and filing in the Western District of Arkansas:Eric S. Brown. An attorney can register through PACER for a CM/ECF login and password if they are admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas or are admitted pro hac vice for this case. Any non-registered attorney should submit the proper attorney admission petition or file an appropriate motion. Please refer to our website http://www.arwd.uscourts.gov/attorney-information for further information. (lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pulfer v. GEICO General Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alexandria Pulfer | |
Represented By: | Eric S Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GEICO General Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Caley B. Vo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.