Scharnhorst v. Cantrell et al
| John William Scharnhorst, III |
| Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell, Major Randall Denzer, Captain Nolan Ake, Corporal Tom Mulvaney and Daniel Gertz |
| 5:2022cv05232 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Mark E Ford |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address for John Scharnhorst. There are no documents to resend. (tg) |
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by John William Scharnhorst, III. Objections to R&R due by 1/30/2023. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on January 11, 2023. (lgd) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S ORDER re PLRA Initial Fee directing Washington County Detention Center to collect from petitioner's prison account an initial partial filing fee of $20.30; thereafter to collect monthly payments from petitioner's prison account in amount equal to 20% of preceding month's income credited to account until $ 350 filing fee is paid in full (cc: Washington County Detention Center). (lgd) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #2 #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983). The Court ordered Plaintiff to submit a complete IFP application. (ECF No. 3). Because Plaintiff has submitted the required information, (ECF No. 5), Plaintiff's IFP application is now before the Court for review. Upon that review, the Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee from the Plaintiff pursuant to the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act.Plaintiff is advised that he is required to immediately inform the Court of any change of address. If Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or prison or released, he shall have 30 days from the date of transfer or release in which to notify the Court of the new address. Plaintiff shall submit a change of address on a separate piece of paper entitled Notice to the Court of Change of Address and not include any motions or otherwise request relief in this document. The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the address change. The case will be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to inform the Court of an address change. The Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee in the amount of $ 350. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on December 20, 2022. (ksb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by John William Scharnhorst, III. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lgd) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished. (lgd) |
Filing 3
ORDER that the matter has been provisionally filed as the undersigned finds that additional information is needed to rule on Plaintiff's IFP application. Specifically the Court requires the following information: Completed IFP, specifically answer to question 3. Failure to comply within the time period specified could result in summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. Completed IFP due by 12/19/2022. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on November 28, 2022. (lgd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by John William Scharnhorst, III. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lgd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Nolan Ake, Jay Cantrell, Randall Denzer, Daniel Gertz, Tom Mulvaney, filed by John William Scharnhorst, III.(lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
