Gaunt v. Relentless Restaurants, LLC
Michael Gaunt |
Relentless Restaurants, LLC |
5:2023cv05070 |
May 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Timothy L Brooks |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The new answer deadline is July 7, 2023. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on June 8, 2023. (ee) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Relentless Restaurants, LLC. (Bell, Sharri) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Keith-Bolden on behalf of Relentless Restaurants, LLC. (Keith-Bolden, Sarah) |
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Relentless Restaurants, LLC's answer is now due 6/9/2023. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on May 25, 2023. (ee) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael N. Shannon on behalf of Relentless Restaurants, LLC. (Shannon, Michael) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Relentless Restaurants, LLC. (Bell, Sharri) |
TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Plaintiff Michael Gaunt. Complaint #2 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney(s), who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Chris Burks. (tmc) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tg) |
Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Relentless Restaurants, LLC and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (tg) |
Filing 3 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to Relentless Restaurants, LLC for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Noe, Lindsey) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT Class and Collective Action Complaint against Relentless Restaurants, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2771777), filed by Michael Gaunt.(Noe, Lindsey) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Michael Gaunt. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gaunt v. Relentless Restaurants, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Gaunt | |
Represented By: | Lindsey Noe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Relentless Restaurants, LLC | |
Represented By: | Michael N. Shannon |
Represented By: | Sarah Keith-Bolden |
Represented By: | Sharri Bell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.