Pittman v. Woods et al
Robert Earl Pittman |
Sheriff Lafayette Woods, Chief Joseph Gorman, Lieutenant Joyce Marshall and Lieutenant Keisha Smith |
5:2023cv05090 |
June 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Timothy L Brooks |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 **DISREGARD - DOCKETED IN ERROR** INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Hearing set for 8/18/2023 01:30 PM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/7/2023. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on June 30, 2023. (slc) Modified on 6/30/2023 (slc). |
Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Eastern District of Arkansas. Docket Sheet and case documents sent to receiving court. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on June 12, 2023. (lgd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Robert Earl Pittman. Motions referred to Christy D. Comstock.(lgd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Joseph Gorman, Joyce Marshall, Keisha Smith, Lafayette Woods, filed by Robert Earl Pittman.(lgd) |
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Case Transferred to the Arkansas Eastern District via Civil Case Extraction. (lgd) |
Case no longer referred to Honorable Christy D. Comstock. (lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.