Matthews v. Washington County Jail et al
| Drew Wilson Matthews |
| Washington County Jail and City of Fayetteville, Arkansas |
| 5:2023cv05163 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Christy D Comstock |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ORDER finding that Plaintiff's petition for relief was improperly filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254. It appears from the petition that Plaintiff seeks relief for alleged violations of his constitutional rights pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1983. Therefore, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case and mail Plaintiff a Section 1983 complaint and in forma pauperis form. Plaintiff is directed to fill out these forms and submit them to the Court if he wishes to pursue his claims in a new case. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on October 2, 2023. (ee) |
| Case no longer referred to Honorable Christy D. Comstock. (lgd) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Drew Wilson Matthews. Motions referred to Christy D. Comstock.(tg) (tg). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Drew Wilson Matthews.(tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
