Jackson v. WalMart, Inc.
| Roderick Jackson |
| WalMart, Inc. |
| 5:2024cv05005 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING In Forma Pauperis Application. With his complaint, Plaintiff submitted an in forma pauperis (IFP) application. However, the application is incomplete because Plaintiff failed to submit page two of the application. For this reason, the Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank IFP application. Plaintiff is given 21 days from the date of this Order to either return the completed application to this court for review and filing or pay the 350.00 dollar filing fee and 55.00 dollar administrative fee, a total of 405.00 dollars. This case shall be subject to dismissal for failure to obey an order of the Court if Plaintiff fails to return the completed IFP application or pay the 405.00 dollar filing fee by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Completed IFP due by 3/6/2024. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on February 14, 2024. (smg) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand as to #1 Complaint against WalMart, Inc., filed by Roderick Jackson. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Roderick Jackson.(tg) |
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING that an Amended Complaint be filed. Amended Complaint due by 2/14/2024. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on January 24, 2024. (lgd)
|
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY MOTION for Service. (bjb) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Christy D. Comstock: 5 MOTION for Service. Motions referred to Honorable Christy D. Comstock.(bjb) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tg) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roderick Jackson. (tg) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Roderick Jackson. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (tg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WalMart, Inc., filed by Roderick Jackson.(tg) |
| Case Presiding Judge Reassigned to Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Honorable P. K. Holmes III no longer assigned to the case. (tg) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Christy D. Comstock: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Roderick Jackson. Motions referred to Honorable Christy D. Comstock.(tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. WalMart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roderick Jackson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WalMart, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
