Sharpe v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
| Kinlee Sharpe |
| Social Security Administration Commissioner |
| 5:2024cv05028 |
| January 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Barry A Bryant |
| Christy D Comstock |
| P K Holmes |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Social Security Administration Commissioner answer due 5/31/2024. Signed by Honorable Barry A Bryant on March 28, 2024. (bjb)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Complaint by Social Security Administration Commissioner. Motions referred to Barry A Bryant.(Moss, Michael) |
| TEXT ONLY MEMO OF REASSIGNMENT. Case referral reassigned to Honorable Barry A Bryant. Honorable Christy D. Comstock no longer assigned to the case. (hnc) |
| Social Security Administration Commissioner served on 1/30/2024, answer due 4/1/2024. (bjb) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S ORDER OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT to a District Judge. Case reassigned to presiding judge Honorable P. K. Holmes III and Honorable Christy D. Comstock, as the referral judge. (bjb) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT Kinlee Sharpe against Social Security Administration Commissioner ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BARWDC-2916369), filed by Kinlee Sharpe.(Coleman, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT to a District Judge for entry of the final judgment or order by Kinlee Sharpe. (Coleman, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DIRECT ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and for entry of a final judgment. You must file the attached form memorializing consent or requesting reassignment to a District Judge within fourteen (14) days. Consent or Reassignment form due by 2/13/2024. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(bjb) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Kinlee Sharpe. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (bjb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sharpe v. Social Security Administration Commissioner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kinlee Sharpe | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Lynn Coleman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner | |
| Represented By: | USAARW Social Security |
| Represented By: | Candace L. Taylor |
| Represented By: | Michael Moss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
