Valor Healthcare, Inc. v. Pinkerton et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 29, 2009
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 98 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Healthstar VA's counterclaim for defamation is dismissed with prejudice while its AUPA and RICO counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice; granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Valor's claim for defamation is dismissed with prejudice; denying as moot 104 Separate Defedants' Joint Objection and Motion to Strike; administratively terminating 96 Motion for Ext ension of Time to File Response/Reply. Valor has five (5) days from the date of this Order to show good cause for its failure to serve Joe Doe Defendants 1-5. Finally, Valor and Healthstar VA have ten (10) days from the date of this Order to provide briefing on the issue of whether the Arkansas Supreme Court would permit use of the federal Small Business Act as the standard for determining fraud and tortious interference with prospective advantage. This case remains set for trial on July 6, 2009. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on May 29, 2009. (cap)
|December 23, 2008
ORDER denying 51 Motion to Dismiss; granting 70 Motion for Order. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on December 23, 2008. (dmc)
|November 17, 2008
ORDER finding as moot 47 Motion to Disqualify Counsel. ; denying 49 Motion to Amend; finding as moot 56 Motion to Dismiss. A hearing remains scheduled in this case for November 26, 2008, at 11:00 a.m.. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on November 17, 2008. (dmc)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?