Hamilton v. Tenet Corporation
Plaintiff: Susan Hamilton
Defendant: Tenet Corporation
Case Number: 6:2008cv06057
Filed: June 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Garland
Presiding Judge: Robert T. Dawson
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dismissing case with prejudice; Granting 4 Motion to Dismiss Case filed by Tenet Corporation. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 12, 2008. (dmc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamilton v. Tenet Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Hamilton
Represented By: Q. Byrum Hurst, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tenet Corporation
Represented By: David Palmer Jaqua
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?