Philson v. Arkadelphia Human Development Center et al
| Michael Philson |
| Arkadelphia Human Development Center, Sharon Mohammed, Rebecca Riggles, Margo Green, Charlene Miller, Julie Wilhelms, Mandy Pierce, Vicky Sun, Marilyn Nasbaun, Cindy Nash, Witt Brown, Phyllis Hankins and Beverly Willis |
| 6:2009cv06053 |
| July 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Hot Springs Office |
| Clark |
| Robert T. Dawson |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on November 10, 2010. (tg)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 MOTION to Dismiss Case and 21 Second MOTION to Dismiss filed by Cindy Nash, Marilyn Nasbaun, Vicky Sun, Rebecca Riggles, Mandy Pierce, Sharon Mohammed, Charlene Miller, Beverly Willis, Witt Brown, Marg o Green, Julie Wilhelms, Phyllis Hankins; ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 in it's intirety. Separate Defendants Sharon Mohammed, Rebecca Riggles, Margo Green, Charlene Miller, Julie Wilhelms, Mandy Pierce, Vicky Sun, Marilyn Nusbaum, Cindy Nash, Witt Brown, Phyllis Hankins, and Beverly Willis are DISMISSED as Defendants in this matter. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on November 9, 2009. (dmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
