Harper v. USA

Petitioner: Rodney Harper
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 6:2010cv06053
Filed: July 13, 2010
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Hot Springs Office
County: Garland
Referring Judge: Barry A. Bryant
Presiding Judge: Robert T. Dawson
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 19, 2010 1 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly, the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED and DISMISSED. Assuming the petition for certiorari is granted in that case, and the U.S. Supreme Court issues a ruling that (1) satisfies the require ments of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3) and (2) applies to the facts in Movants case, Movant may re-file his Section 2255 motion. The motion is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in all other respects. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on October 19, 2010. (dmc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harper v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodney Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?