Carter et al v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. et al
| Martha Carter and Kimberly Ruff |
| Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Xerox Corporation and ACS@Xerox LLC |
| 6:2010cv06074 |
| October 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Hot Springs Office |
| Garland |
| Robert T. Dawson |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER granting 42 Motion to Dismiss, and Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 11, 2014. (lw)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 5 Motion to Compel and a stay of these proceedings is hereby ORDERED pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 3. The parties shall advise the court within ten (10) days of any ruling in arbitration as to any remaining issues for this court.; ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 37 Report and Recommendations re 5 . Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on January 11, 2011. (dmc)
|
|
Filing
37
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration filed by ACS@Xerox LLC, Xerox Corporation, Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.. Objections to R&R due by 1/1/2011. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on December 15, 2010. (dmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
