Goza v. Multi-Purpose Civic Center Facilities Board For Pulaski County, Arkansas et al
| Kristin Bunn Goza |
| Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Ticketmaster, L.L.C. and Multi-Purpose Civic Center Facilities Board For Pulaski County, Arkansas |
| 6:2012cv06125 |
| November 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Hot Springs Office |
| Clark |
| Susan O. Hickey |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
ORDER granting 53 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 57 Motion to Stay; denying without prejudice 85 Motion for Hearing. The clerk is directed to terminate motion 89 Motion for Summary Judgment, motion 40 Motion for Partial Summary Jud gment, motion 43 Motion for Summary Judgment and motion 59 Motion to Stay. Because the configuration of this case has changed significantly, the Court requests that Verizon Arena refile a single motion for summary judgment combining the issues addressed in its previous two motions. If Verizon Arena wishes to refile the motion, it should do so by 8/22/2014. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 23, 2014. (lw)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER adopting 33 Report and Recommendations; denying 10 Motion to Dismiss; denying 12 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on August 27, 2013. (adw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
