Reddin v. Fronte
Plaintiff: Matthew Reddin
Defendant: Fronte
Case Number: 6:2016cv06072
Filed: July 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office: Hot Springs Office
County: U.S., Outside State
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Ford
Presiding Judge: Susan O. Hickey
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER adopting 42 Report and Recommendations in toto. Further, granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant in his official capacity are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, Claims against his individual capacity remain for further consideration. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on February 9, 2018. (hnc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reddin v. Fronte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Reddin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fronte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?