Kain v. Correctional Medical Services et al
| Billy J Kain, Jr |
| Correctional Medical Services, Corizion Medical Services, Wendy Kelly, Correct Care Solutions, LaSalle Corrections, Nannette Vowell, Jeffery Stieve, Rory Griffith and Andrea Beasley |
| 6:2017cv06037 |
| April 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Hot Springs Office |
| U.S., Outside State |
| Barry A. Bryant |
| Susan O. Hickey |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Plaintiff failed to comply with Court Orders and failed to pay filing fee as required. All pending Motions are DENIED. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 24, 2018. (hnc)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER ADOPTING 99 Report and Recommendations; Further, denying 97 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may renew his motion for leave to appeal IFP with the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 19, 2018. (mjm)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER adopting 89 Report and Recommendations; Further granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion to Revoke IFP status. Plaintiff's IFP status is REVOKED. Plaintiff must pay $350.00 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on June 20, 2018. (hnc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
