Hurlbut v. Liggett et al
Daniel Bryce Hurlbut |
Charles Liggett, Correct Care Solutions and Kellog-Carter |
6:2018cv06016 |
February 1, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Hot Springs Office |
Hot Spring |
Mark E. Ford |
P. K. Holmes |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER ADOPTING IN ITS ENTIRETY 73 Report and Recommendations. Further, GRANTING 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Complaint against all Defendants should be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 10, 2019.(mjm) |
Filing 78 ORDER denying 75 Motion Motion to Seal Notice of Change of Address. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on August 16, 2019. (mll) |
Filing 38 ORDER denying 31 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; Further denying 32 Motion to Stay. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on December 28, 2018. (hnc) |
Filing 27 ORDER denying 18 Motion to Compel and to Appoint Counsel ; denying 24 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying 25 Motion to Propound 75 Interrogatories ; denying as premature, 26 Motion to Appoint Expert Witness. Plaintiff is advised that the submission of any further motions concerning the possession of his medical records will only serve to delay his case. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on October 25, 2018. (hnc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.