King v. Jackson et al
Plaintiff: Michael Ray King
Defendant: Sgt. Clark, Mrs. Hosman, Lt. Jackson and Dr. Vowell
Case Number: 6:2018cv06104
Filed: October 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Mark E Ford
Referring Judge: P K Holmes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER denying #12 and #15 Motion to transfer to a different ADC unit; Further denying #14 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court is granting #13 and #16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Second Amended Complaint; Second Amended Complaint due by 12/14/2018. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on November 30, 2018. (hnc)
November 29, 2018 Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Second Amended Complaint by Michael Ray King. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lw)
November 29, 2018 Filing 15 MOTION to be moved to a different ADC by Michael Ray King. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lw)
November 29, 2018 Filing 14 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Michael Ray King. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lw)
November 28, 2018 Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Second Amended Complaint by Michael Ray King. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lw)
November 19, 2018 Filing 12 MOTION To transfer plaintiff to another ADC unit by Michael Ray King. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(mjm)
November 13, 2018 Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING COMPLAINT DEFICIENCY. After review of the First Amended Complaint, it is determined that Plaintiff failed to obey the Court's prior Order to submit the complaint on the court-approved form for this District. For this reason, Plaintiff is directed to submit Second Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to mail the Plaintiff a court-approved 1983 form.In the Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements telling the Court: the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated;the name of the Defendant who violated the right;exactly what the Defendant did or failed to do;how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of the constitutional rights;and what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of the misconduct of that Defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,371-72,377 (1976);Fed.R.Civ.P.8. Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he has named as a Defendant. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that he must affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury he suffered. If he fails to do so, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to state a claim.Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is a Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety ON THE COURT-APPROVED FORM. You may not refer back to any part of the original complaint. A Second Amended Complaint supersedes, or takes the place of, all previous Complaints. After amendment, the Court will treat the previous Complaints as nonexistent. Any cause of action that was raised in the previous Complaints is waived if it is not raised in the Second Amended Complaint. This case shall be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to return the Second Amended Complaint to the Court by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Second Amended Complaint due by 12/4/2018. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on November 13, 2018. (klk)
November 13, 2018 Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT as to #1 Complaint, filed by Michael Ray King. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Michael Ray King. (hnc)
October 29, 2018 Filing 9 CLERK'S ORDER re PLRA Fee directing ADC-Ouachita River Unit to collect from petitioner's prison account monthly payments in amount equal to 20% of preceding month's income credited to account until $350.00 filing fee is paid in full (cc: AR Board of Corrections, Compliance Division; Department of Correction, Trust Fund & Centralized Banking Office; Fiscal Manager, AR Department of Community Correction). (mjm)
October 29, 2018 Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, the clerk is directed to collect the $350.00 filing fee from the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on October 29, 2018. (klk)
October 26, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Ray King. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lw)
October 22, 2018 Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING COMPLAINT DEFICIENCY. After review of the Complaint, it is determined that the Plaintiff did not submit the complaint on the court-approved form for this District. For this reason, Plaintiff is directed to submit an Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to mail the Plaintiff a court-approved 1983 form.In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements telling the Court: the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated;the name of the Defendant who violated the right;exactly what the Defendant did or failed to do;how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of the constitutional rights;and what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of the misconduct of that Defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,371-72,377 (1976);Fed.R.Civ.P.8. Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he has named as a Defendant. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that he must affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury he suffered. If he fails to do so, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to state a claim.Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is a First Amended Complaint. The First Amended Complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the court-approved form. You may not refer back to any part of the original complaint. A First Amended Complaint supersedes, or takes the place of, the original Complaint. After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint as nonexistent. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint is waived if it is not raised in the First Amended Complaint. This case shall be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to return the Amended Complaint to the Court by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Amended Complaint due by 11/13/2018. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on October 22, 2018. (klk)
October 22, 2018 Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING In Forma Pauperis Application. With his complaint, Plaintiff failed to submit either the filing fee or an in forma pauperis (IFP) application. For this reason, the Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank Prisoner IFP Application. Plaintiff is given 21 days from the date of this Order to either file a completed IFP application or pay the 350.00 dollar filing fee and 50.00 dollar administrative fee, a total of 400.00 dollars. This case shall be subject to dismissal for failure to obey an order of the Court if Plaintiff fails to return the completed IFP application or pay the 400.00 dollar filing fee by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Completed IFP due by 11/13/2018. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on October 22, 2018. (klk)
October 19, 2018 Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (lw)
October 19, 2018 Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Arkansas Eastern; Case Number 4:18-cv-00772. Docket sheet received.
October 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to transfer this case immediately to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Hot Springs Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/19/2018. (kdr) [Transferred from ared on 10/19/2018.]
October 19, 2018 TEXT ONLY NOTICE: COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) transferred in from Eastern District of Arkansas. (lw)
October 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against all Defendants filed by Michael Ray King.(cel) [Transferred from ared on 10/19/2018.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Jackson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mrs. Hosman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Vowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Ray King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?