Blees v. Gentiva Certified Healthcare Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Toni Blees
Defendant: Gentiva Certified Healthcare Corp. and KAH Development 4, LLC
Case Number: 6:2020cv06072
Filed: July 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Robert T Dawson
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2020 Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #8 Joint Motion to Stay. This action is stayed through October 18, 2020, so the parties may explore a negotiated resolution. The stay may be lifted before October 18, 2020, on joint request of the parties or on request of either party upon at least ten (10) days advance written notice to the opposing party. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on August 20, 2020. (mcc) Modified on 8/24/2020 to edit text (mjm).
August 19, 2020 Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Stay by Toni Blees. (Sanford, Josh)
August 5, 2020 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Compel Arbitration by Gentiva Certified Healthcare Corp., KAH Development 4, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Jeremy Ballard)(Ebelhar, Jay)
August 5, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Compel Arbitration by Gentiva Certified Healthcare Corp., KAH Development 4, LLC. (Ebelhar, Jay)
July 6, 2020 Filing 5 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Gentiva Certified Healthcare Corp., KAH Development 4, LLC and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (hnc)
July 6, 2020 Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (hnc)
July 6, 2020 Filing 3 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to Gentiva Certified Healthcare Corp. and KAH Development 4, LLC for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Sanford, Josh)
July 6, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AARWDC-2172282), filed by Toni Blees.(Sanford, Josh)
July 6, 2020 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Toni Blees. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day your case may be terminated. (hnc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blees v. Gentiva Certified Healthcare Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gentiva Certified Healthcare Corp.
Represented By: Jay A. Ebelhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KAH Development 4, LLC
Represented By: Jay A. Ebelhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toni Blees
Represented By: Josh Sanford
Represented By: Conrad Thomas Odom, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?