Stainbrook v. Beck
| Heather Stainbrook |
| Otto Beck doing business as New Vision Properties |
| 6:2021cv06042 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Susan O Hickey |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard David Burke, III on behalf of All Defendants. (Burke, Richard) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Otto Beck.(Morrissey, Travis) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Travis Jeremy Morrissey on behalf of All Defendants. (Morrissey, Travis) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint, Summons, Notice, filed by Heather Stainbrook. Otto Beck served on 4/20/2021, answer due 5/11/2021. (Ramm, Natalie) |
| Filing 5 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Otto Beck and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (jlm) |
| Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to Otto Beck, Defendant for service of the following document: #2 Complaint, #3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form, #1 Civil Cover Sheet,. (Ramm, Natalie) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (jlm) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Otto Beck ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2372045), filed by Heather Stainbrook.(Ramm, Natalie) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Heather Stainbrook. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day your case may be terminated. (jlm) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE: The following attorney(s) listed on Civil Cover Sheet, #1 is (are) not registered for CM/ECF noticing and filing in the Western District of Arkansas:Natalie Ramm and Cameron Bowden. An attorney can register through PACER for a CM/ECF login and password if they are admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas or are admitted pro hac vice for this case. Any non-registered attorney should submit the proper attorney admission petition or file an appropriate motion. Please refer to our website http://www.arwd.uscourts.gov/attorney-information for further information. (jlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stainbrook v. Beck | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Otto Beck doing business as New Vision Properties | |
| Represented By: | Richard David Burke, III |
| Represented By: | Travis Jeremy Morrissey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Heather Stainbrook | |
| Represented By: | Jason Thomas Auer |
| Represented By: | Natalie Ramm |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
