Ross v. Sanson
Sean Scott Ross |
Jodi Sanson MD |
6:2021cv06120 |
August 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Robert T Dawson |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1402 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's #1 complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on October 6, 2021. (mjm) |
TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Defendant Jodi Sanson MD. Reply to Response to Motion #11 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney, who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Andrea L. Kleinhez. (lw) |
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss - REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS - filed by Jodi Sanson MD. (Glover, David) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sean Scott Ross. (mjm) |
Filing 9 ORDER denying #2 and #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and motion for service (Filing Fee due by 10/15/2021). Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on September 15, 2021. (jlm) Modified on 9/20/2021 to add document number(lw). |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, MOTION for Service by Sean Scott Ross. (mjm) |
Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO MOTION #5 TO DISMISS. Plaintiff is directed to respond to this motion. Plaintiff is advised that failure to timely and properly comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Response to Motion to Dismiss due by 9/21/2021. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on August 31, 2021. (apm) Modified text on 8/31/2021 (hnc). |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Jodi Sanson MD. (Glover, David) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Jodi Sanson MD. (Glover, David) |
Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING that a Completed IFP be filed. Completed IFP due by 9/10/2021. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on August 18, 2021. (jlm) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mjm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, MOTION for Service by Sean Scott Ross. (mjm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jodi Sanson MD, filed by Sean Scott Ross.(mjm) |
MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Barry A. Bryant: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis MOTION for Service filed by Sean Scott Ross. Motions referred to Honorable Barry A. Bryant.(mjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ross v. Sanson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sean Scott Ross | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jodi Sanson MD | |
Represented By: | David P. Glover |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.