Rangel v. White
| Carlos R. Rangel |
| Gary White |
| 6:2022cv06124 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Susan O Hickey |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Gary White (Elliott, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 10 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Gary White. (Elliott, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to be held on or before 2/3/2023. JOINT Rule 26(f) Meeting Report due by 2/10/2023. Jury Trial set for 3/4/2024 in Hot Springs -- 3rd flr (Rm 360) before Honorable Susan O. Hickey. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 10, 2023. (rwg) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Gary White.(Elliott, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint, filed by Carlos R. Rangel. Gary White served on 12/3/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Henry on behalf of Carlos R. Rangel. (Henry, Megan) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Plaintiff Carlos R. Rangel. Complaint #2 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney, who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Megan A. Henry. (hnc) |
| Filing 5 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Gary White and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (jlm) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (jlm) |
| Filing 3 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to Carl White for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Gary White ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2694810), filed by Carlos R. Rangel.(Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Carlos R. Rangel. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3). (jlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rangel v. White | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carlos R. Rangel | |
| Represented By: | Brandon W. Lacy |
| Represented By: | Megan Henry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gary White | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey C Elliott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
