Veals v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Ernestine Veals |
Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC |
6:2022cv06129 |
December 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Susan O Hickey |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for the week of 3/4/2024 @ 09:00 AM in Hot Springs -- 3rd flr (Rm 360) before Honorable Susan O. Hickey. See Order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on February 22, 2023. (rwg) |
Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC. (Fairley, J.) |
Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to be held on or before 2/3/2023. JOINT Rule 26(f) Meeting Report due by 2/10/2023. Jury Trial set for 3/4/2024 in Hot Springs -- 3rd flr (Rm 360) before Honorable Susan O. Hickey. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 10, 2023. (rwg) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC. (Fairley, J.) |
Filing 5 STATE COURT ANSWER to #4 Complaint by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC. (Originally filed on 12/30/2022 in Hot Spring County Circuit Court)(mjm) |
Filing 4 STATE COURT COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, filed by Ernestine Veals. (Originally filed on 11/29/2022 in Hot Spring County Circuit Court)(mjm) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mjm) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Hot Spring County, case number 30CV-22-336., filed by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC.(mjm) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC. (mjm) |
Notice of Removal filing fee paid re Clerk's Notice Regarding Filing Fee,, : $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2707730.. (Fairley, J.) |
CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 1/3/2023. (mjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Veals v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ernestine Veals | |
Represented By: | Jim R. Jackson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC | |
Represented By: | Adam D. Franks |
Represented By: | J. Carter Fairley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.