Dominique D. Lasker v. FBOP et al
| Dominique D. Lasker |
| Linda T McGrew, D. Wren and FBOP |
| 5:2019cv00286 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #3 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. (iv)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Re APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(dml) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner filed by Dominique D. Lasker. (car) |
| Filing 2 ERROR BRIEF filed by plaintiff Dominique D. Lasker. (car) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, filed by plaintiff Dominique D. Lasker. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
