Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wren v. (fnu) (lnu)
as 5:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Wren
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and (fnu) (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re Omnicom Group. Inc. ERISA Litigation
as 1:2020cv04141
Plaintiff:
Surfina Adams, Daniel Dise, Shane Tepper and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-30, Administrative Committee, Omnicom Group, Inc., Omnicom Group, Inc. and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Carol Maisonette
Consolidated Defendant:
Administrative Committee of the Omnicom Group Retirement Savings Plan and Does No. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
WREN v. WATSON
as 2:2019cv00554
Respondent:
T. WATSON
Petitioner:
SHANNON D. WREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dominique D. Lasker v. FBOP et al
as 5:2019cv00286
Defendant:
Linda T McGrew, D. Wren and FBOP
Plaintiff:
Dominique D. Lasker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRIEDMAN v. HATTERAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00533
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRIEDMAN
Defendant:
HATTERAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, DAVID W BERSON, BENJAMIN M HOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bushansky v. Hatteras Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv01621
Defendant:
Hatteras Financial Corp., David W. Berson, Benjamin M. Hough and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
WILSON v. HATTERAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Defendant:
HATTERAS FINANCIAL CORPORATION , DAVID W BERSON , MICHAEL R HOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Wren v. Maye
as 4:2014cv01270
Petitioner:
Shannon D. Wren
Respondent:
C. Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brandon Gun and Pawn, LLC v. Holder, Jr. et al
as 3:2013cv00628
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gun and Pawn, LLC
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice - Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Matthew D. Wren
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
