Cases 1 - 10 of 399
Soto v. Eischen et al
as 0:2025cv01375
Petitioner:
Hector Fabian Soto
Respondent:
B. Eischen, FPC Duluth and FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jobin v. Eischen et al
as 0:2025cv01376
Petitioner:
Damon Vincent Jobin
Respondent:
B. Eischen, FPC Duluth and FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fredrickson v. Weaver et al
as 3:2025cv00820
Plaintiff:
Timothy Fredrickson
Defendant:
Bryan Weaver, FNU Russle, FNU Schanfish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Mobley v. FBOP - McDowell
as 1:2025cv00206
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
FBOP- McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Escobar-Villegas v. Warden, FCI Thomson et al
as 3:2025cv50133
Petitioner:
Jonathan Escobar-Villegas
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Thomson, Director, U.S. FBOP, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Mobley v. FBOP - MCDOWELL
as 3:2025cv00038
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
FBOP - MCDOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Silver (PS) v. FBOP et al
as 1:2025cv00720
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Silver
Defendant:
FBOP, USP Florence High Administration, Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. FBOP
as 5:2025cv00275
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
