Cases 1 - 10 of 100
JACKSON v. FBOP et al
as 2:2026cv00606
Plaintiff:
AARON ANTHONY JACKSON
Defendant:
FBOP, USP TERRE HAUTE and R. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fleming v. Unit Manager O'Brien et al
as 0:2026cv03851
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Fleming
Defendant:
Unit Manager O'Brien, Heidi Baez Patino, William Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devin Wilson v. Marshall
as 26-6908
Plaintiff:
DEVIN WILSON
Defendant:
FBOP C.O. MARSHALL, SIS LT. JOHN DOE, #1, HAZELTON WARDEN KEN HOOVER and others
Johnson v. Lewis, et al
as 26-1962
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SHEREEN LEWIS, ASHLEY JENKINS, MDC BROOKLYN and others
Griss v. FBOP et al
as 6:2026cv00241
Plaintiff:
Sean Griss
Defendant:
FBOP, USP McCreary, Warden Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crosby v. Warden ADX, et al
as 26-1327
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. CROSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent:
WARDEN ADX and NORTH CENTRAL REGION, FBOP
Johnson v. FBOP Psychologist Kissin et al
as 1:2026cv13783
Plaintiff:
Robert Willie Johnson
Defendant:
FBOP Psychologist Kissin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, State of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Graham v. Marshall et al
as 6:2026cv00230
Plaintiff:
Morris Houston Graham
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, III, Chris Bina, Officer Fuson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 1:2026cv00541
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Shereen Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Thomas v. FBOP
as 5:2026cv01898
Petitioner:
Dominique D Thomas
Respondent:
FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
