Armstrong v. Soto
Petitioner: Bruce Armstrong
Respondent: John Soto
Case Number: 1:2015cv01109
Filed: July 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Madera
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER ADOPTING 46 Findings and Recommendations In Part, DENYING Amended Habeas Petition, and CLOSING this Case, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/29/2020. The court will issue a certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Rivera, O)
April 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER DENYING 30 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus 17 be DENIED signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 4/8/2020. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER Requiring Supplemental Submissions, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 6/17/19. 14-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
August 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER Granting Respondent's 35 Request for Leave to File a Response to Petitioner's Supplemental Brief, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/3/17. (Gonzalez, R)
May 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 05/28/2017. (Case Management Deadline: 30-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)
January 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Granting Motion to Lift Stay; ORDER Granting Motion to Substitute Respondent, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/11/17. Amended Petition Due Within 14 Days. Debbie Asuncion added. John Soto terminated. (Gonzalez, R)
January 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Adopting 11 Findings and Recommendations to Grant 3 Motion to Stay Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/22/16. CASE STAYED. (Gonzalez, R)
September 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that the 3 Motion to Stay the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Granted signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/21/2015. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 10/26/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
July 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:15-cv-1443 WBS CMK HC) to Fresno (1:15-cv-1109 MJS HC) signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/16/2015. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Armstrong v. Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bruce Armstrong
Represented By: David Reagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?