Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Jones v. Armstrong
as 24-50016
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Earl Helmer, Treyvon Hocutt and others
Moses v. Lumpkin
as 23-50751
Petitioner / Appellant:
DeAngelo Donte Moses
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Bruce Armstrong and Jerry Sanchez
Moses v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00647
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Donte Moses
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Lumpkin
as 23-50613
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rickey L. McGee
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Hughes Unit Warden Bruce Armstrong, Huges Unit Warden Justin Wade and others
Mungaray v. Collier
as 23-50595
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jorge Mungaray
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, C. F. Hazelwood and others
Lumsden v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, FNU Hazelwood, A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Collier
as 23-20225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darryl Bell
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, John Doe, TDCJ Director, Jerry Sanchez, Regional Director and others
Ballard v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard v. Armstrong
as 6:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lumsden v. Collier
as 23-50129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond E. Lumsden
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, C. F. Hazelwood and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
