Thomas v. Matevousian, et al.
Reginald R Thomas |
Andre Matevousian, Cassidy, Ciufo, Fields, Hayes, Copus, Gardea, Larson, Lyons, Padgett and Lopez |
1:2017cv01592 |
November 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Merced |
Gary S. Austin |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER on FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 ; dismissing case, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim under Bivens 16 and directing Clerk to close case signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/18/2019. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 17 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this case be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim under Bivens re 16 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/18/2018. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 15 ORDER adopting 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 7 Motion for preliminary injunctive relief signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/9/2018. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 14 ORDER DENYING 13 Motion to Stay, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 05/7/18. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 9 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/19/2018 recommending that Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief be denied. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R's due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.