Cases 1 - 10 of 90
USA v. Mata-Gardea
as 23-11244
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Hiram Mata-Gardea
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. et al
as 3:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V., Armando Gutierrez Rosas, Maria de Lourdes Tolentino Roque and others
Evans v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
Sterling Brandon Evans
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Kisha Houston, Kimberly Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
GARDEA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10585
Plaintiff:
RUBEN CRUZ GARDEA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Flores Jaramillo v. Gardea
as 3:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Flores Jaramillo
Defendant:
Jaime Gardea doing business as Taqueria El Paso
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
GARDEA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22680
Plaintiff:
JUAN GARDEA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sarah Gardea v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv01693
Plaintiff:
Sarah Gardea
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and DOES 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Gardea Cereceres v. Garland
as 22-134
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO GARDEA CERECERES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Raul Gardea, Jr. v. Raymond Madden
as 22-55069
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAUL GARDEA, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Mull v. Houston Indep Sch Dist
as 22-20001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Markethia Mull
Defendant / Appellee:
Houston Independent School District, Sonia Quintanilla, Houston Independent School District Police Officer, Marguerite Gardea and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
