Epperson v. United States, et al.
| Chris Epperson |
| United States, FBI, CIA, DEA and Donald Trump |
| 1:2022cv00855 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
FIRST SCREENING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/8/2022. (Kusamura, W)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order served on Chris Epperson. (Kusamura, W) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS by Chris Epperson. Address Remains the Same. (Sant Agata, S) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/17/2022. (Sant Agata, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Chris Epperson. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S ADDRESS UPDATED to 8521 Paradise Rd., Apt. 126, Spring Valley, CA 91977 pursuant to Notice of Change of Address filed in 1:22-cv-00734-EPG. (Lawrence, A) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Chris Epperson. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CIA, DEA, FBI, Donald Trump, United States by Chris Epperson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lundstrom, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
