Cases 1 - 10 of 919
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Harrison v. Barnes et al
as 2:2024cv04996
Defendant:
Mike, Johnny D., DEA Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Deas et al v. The United States of America
as 0:2024cv61226
Plaintiff:
B. D. and Daniela Deas
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Deas v. Semaine Health Co.
as 2:2024at00775
Plaintiff:
Haylah Deas
Defendant:
Semaine Health Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Deas v. Semaine Health Co.
as 2:2024cv01744
Plaintiff:
Haylah Deas
Defendant:
Semaine Health Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Deas v. Atkinson et al
as 5:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Kenneth Atkinson, Trevor Smith, Scott Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. South Carolina DEA Narcotics Federal Agents
as 6:2024cv03247
Plaintiff:
Justice Smith
Defendant:
South Carolina DEA Narcotics Federal Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Smith v. Charlotte NC DEA Federal Narcotic Officers
as 3:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Justice Smith
Defendant:
Charlotte NC DEA Federal Narcotic Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. WINSTON SALEM NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH v. GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant:
GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
