Wilson v. Tucci et al.
| David W. Wilson |
| Nicole M. Tucci, David Silbaugh, Brian Duffy, Robert W. Fox, M. Voong, Gary Thomsor, M. Kaplan, J. Barclay, R. Rose, D. Huntly, T. Richardson, D. Anthony, J. Wieland, Santos, D. Artis and J.D. Lozoano |
| 2:2015cv02404 |
| November 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/20/2018 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
31
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/19/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/13/18 DENYING the 28 Motion for Reconsideration. The 27 Court's previously imposed filing fee deadline has now lapsed. Given the delays occasioned by this motion for reconsideration, plaintiff shall have an additional 14 days to pay the $400.00 filing fee. Failure to pay the filing fee by this deadline will result in the dismissal of this action. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/20/2018 ADOPTING 23 Findings and Recommendations to the extent consistent with this order, and without reaching the substance of footnote 1 and DENYING 2 and 4 Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in this action under the three strikes provision. Within 30 days from the date of this order plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $400.00 required for this action and Plaintiff's outstanding 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 18 , and 26 Motions are DENIED without prejudice to their renewal, as appropriate, upon payment of the required filing fee. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
23
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/26/18 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 , 4 be denied, plaintiff be barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in this action under the 3 strikes provision of 28 USC 1915(g), all pending motions be denied as moot, and this case be dismissed without prejudice. Motions 2 and 4 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/10/17 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed September 7, 2016, are NOT ADOPTED; and this matter is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings consistent with this order.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/6/16 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 2 , 4 ) be denied, plaintiff be barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in this action under the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g), all pending motions be denied as moot, and this case be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
