Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Louis Peets v. Jerry Brown, Jr., et al
as 23-15101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions and others
Ronnie Govea v. Robert Fox, et al
as 23-15034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE R. GOVEA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, F. RADING, JOSEPH BICK and others
James Hampton v. Robert Fox
as 22-56085
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EARL HAMPTON
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden
Xiong v. Fox
as 2:2022at00307
Petitioner:
Yor Xiong
Respondent:
Robert W. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Xiong v. Fox

as 2:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
Yor Xiong
Respondent:
Robert W. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Louis Peets v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 21-16395
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions, ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, Warden and others
Defendant:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., VALERIE VILLARREAL, CARMEN HAMILTON and others
James Floyd v. Robert Fox
as 21-15453
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES FLOYD
Shaheed Scott, Sr. v. CDCR, et al
as 21-15443
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, R. L. BRIGGS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAHEED SCOTT, Sr., AKA Rodney L. Scott
(PC) McCowan v. McKeown et al

as 2:2021cv00369
Defendant:
Bick, A. Saeyang, M. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond McCowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wilson v. California Medical Facility, et al
as 21-15237
Defendant / Appellee:
HANK BLANK, Correctional Plant Supervisor, R. W. FOX, MICHAEL C. SMITH, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.