Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Louis Peets v. Jerry Brown, Jr., et al
as 23-15811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions and others
Louis Peets v. Jerry Brown, Jr., et al
as 23-15101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions and others
Ronnie Govea v. Robert Fox, et al
as 23-15034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE R. GOVEA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, F. RADING, JOSEPH BICK and others
James Hampton v. Robert Fox
as 22-56085
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EARL HAMPTON
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden
(HC) Xiong v. Fox
as 2:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
Yor Xiong
Respondent:
Robert W. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Xiong v. Fox
as 2:2022at00307
Petitioner:
Yor Xiong
Respondent:
Robert W. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) McCowan v. McKeown et al
as 2:2021cv00369
Defendant:
Bick, A. Saeyang, M. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond McCowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Scott v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2020cv01820
Petitioner:
Shaheed Scott, Sr. and Rodney L. Scott
Respondent:
D. Artis, R. L. Briggs, G. Thumser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Scott v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2020cv01223
Petitioner:
Shaheed Scott, Sr.
Respondent:
D. Artis, R. L. Briggs, G. Thumser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Hampton v. Robert W. Fox et al
as 2:2020cv07562
Defendant:
Institution Security Unit, Robert W. Fox, Receiving and Releasing Officers and others
Plaintiff:
James Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
