Cases 1 - 9 of 9
David Wilson v. Robert Fox, et al
as 17-17091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, BRIAN DUFFY, Ex-Warden, D. HURLEY, Associate Warden and others
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2017mc00040
Respondent:
MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI, JONATHAN REECE ARMSTRONG, ROBERT LEE ARTHUR and others
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA ANN DEAK
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Defendant:
CASEY COLE KANNENBERG
Barclay v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Barclay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
David Wilson v. Robert Fox, et al
as 16-16873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, BRIAN DUFFY, Ex-Warden, D. HURLEY, Associate Warden and others
Wilson v. Tucci et al.
as 2:2015cv02404
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Nicole M. Tucci, David Silbaugh, Brian Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Fox et al.
as 2:2015cv02108
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Robert W Fox, Brian Duffy, D. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pugh v. Cole et al
as 5:2013cv01313
Plaintiff:
Leroy David Pugh
Defendant:
L. Cole and J. Barclay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Calvin Coolidge Johnson v. E Nixon et al
as 2:2012cv01854
Defendant:
Barclay, P J Barclay, Hansen and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Coolidge Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
