Patrick v. Hitchcock, et al.
Plaintiff: Nicholas Patrick
Defendant: Hitchcock, Hathaway, McIntyre, Kingsley, Lee and Boxall
Case Number: 2:2017cv01045
Filed: May 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/8/21 ADOPTING in full 45 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 36 Defendants' unopposed motion for terminating sanctions. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
February 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 45 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/16/2021 RECOMMENDING 36 Motion for Terminating Sanctions be granted. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/20/20 DENYING 41 Motion for Extension of time and DISREGARDING 42 Motion for Reconsideration, construed as a late-filed opposition to defendants' motion to compel. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate 41 and 42 as pending motions. (Plummer, M)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 08/10/20 GRANTING 38 Motion to Stay the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. The Court will issue new discovery and dispositive motions deadlines, if necessary, after resolution of the pending motion for involuntary dismissal. (Plummer, M) Modified on 8/10/2020 (Plummer, M).
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 08/03/20 ORDERING Plaintiffs motion to oppose sanctions 35 is construed as an untimely opposition to defendants motion to compel discovery. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket to reflect that plaintiffs motion to oppose sanctions 35 is construed as an opposition to defendants motion to compel discovery 33 and to terminate 35 as a pending motion. The Clerk of the Court is also directed to update the docket to reflect that defendants reply to plaintiffs motion 36 is construed as a pending motion for involuntary dismissal of this action. Plaintiff may submit an opposition to defendants motion for involuntary dismissal 36 within 30 days of the date of this order.(Plummer, M)
June 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/12/2020 GRANTING 33 defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery. Plaintiff shall, upon re-notice, appear for deposition at a location in the venue where this action was brought. The discovery a nd scheduling order 28 shall be extended 60 days. The parties may conduct discovery until 8/10/2020 and all dispositive motions shall be filed by 10/20/2020. Plaintiff shall reimburse defendants for the reasonable expenses associated with his failure to appear at his deposition, totaling $ 4,156.55, within 30 days of the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/3/2019 GRANTING Defendants leave to conduct Plaintiff's deposition via videoconference. (Becknal, R)
May 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/23/18 GRANTING 13 Motion for Extension of time. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
March 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/30/2018 ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations in full, except as stated above and DISMISSING 1 Complaint, for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Injunctive Relief is DENIED. (York, M)
February 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/14/2018 RECOMMENDING that 1 Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend and 7 Motion for Injunctive Relief be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Fabillaran, J)
May 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/24/2017 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Nicholas Patrick. Plaintiff is required to pay the full statutory filing fee of $350 for this action. CDCR to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department)(Henshaw, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patrick v. Hitchcock, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Patrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hitchcock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hathaway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McIntyre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kingsley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boxall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?