Rodriguez v. Moore et al
| Steven R. Rodriguez |
| Steve Moore, De La Cruz, Goulart, Gudino, Estrada, Hayes and Blake |
| 2:2018cv01089 |
| May 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/16/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/28/2018 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Steven R. Rodriguez. The Sheriff of San Joaquin County shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/14/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. (Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
