(PC) Windham v. Pike et al
| Charles Windham |
| Michael Pike, Matthew Swett, Donald Mathews, Russ Calvert, Francisco Chavez, Walter Oxborrow, Mary Fraker, George Cazares, Marisol Saragoza, Walter Sampley, Luis Ruiz, D. Pasioles, Mercado, Mendez, Rondez, Perata, Smith, Navarro, Perez, King, Olsen, Kabir Matharu, Richard Weiss, Chris Dibble, Booth, Brian James, West, Barry Lamon, Lara, Prothero, Hamilton and Jeffrey Lee Fecht |
| 2:2022cv02007 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/4/2023 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley, and Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's.(Reader, L)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #17 Findings and Recommendations, served on Charles Windham. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 01/02/23 ADOPTING #12 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING #3 Motion for TRO. (Benson, A.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #16 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations served on Charles Windham. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing 15
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP served on the Director of CDCR pursuant to #14 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from the Prison Account of Charles Windham signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/18/2022.The appropriate agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's ifp on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/18/2022 GRANTING plaintiff's #2 request to proceed ifp, DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend, and DENYING plaintiff's #10 request for a copy of the court's docket sheet. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the concurrent order. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall compete and return the Notice of Amendment with the required forms. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/21/2022 RECOMMENDING that the #3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Spichka, K.)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/18/2022 DENYING the #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice. (Spichka, K.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Findings and Recommendations served on Charles Windham. (Spichka, K.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #13 , #14 Orders served on Charles Windham. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 9
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-02007 TLN KJN (PC). (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 8
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Charles Windham. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 10
REQUEST for copy of the docket sheet by Charles Windham. (Kastilahn, A)(Response sent: "The Clerk's Office will provide copies of documents and of the docket sheet at $0.50 per page.") Modified on 11/18/2022 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing 7
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT as to Charles Windham. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a certified prison trust account statement for Charles Windham, CDCR No. F-14030 to the Clerk's Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The prison trust account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in.pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Text Only Entry) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 5
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *11/7/2022*. Consent or Decline due by 12/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
SERVICE BY EMAIL: #5 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Charles Windham. (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Charles Windham. (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Charles Windham. (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Charles Windham. (Woodworth, M.)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Charles Windham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Woodworth, M.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
