(PC) Williams v. Hill et al
| Melvin Williams |
| Rick M. Hill and Thomas |
| 2:2023cv00958 |
| May 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 6/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the SACRAMENTO Division of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/22/2023. Old Case Number 1:23-cv-00763-BAM(PC). (Sant Agata, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order served on Melvin Williams. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Melvin Williams. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Rick M. Hill, Thomas by Melvin Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sant Agata, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
