Yurok Tribe et al v. United States Bureau of Reclamation
| Yurok Tribe, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources and Klamath Riverkeeper |
| United States Bureau of Reclamation and National Marine Fisheries Service |
| Klamath Water Users Association, Sunnyside Irrigation District, Ben DuVal, Klamath Drainage District, Klamath Irrigation District and Pine Grove Irrigation District |
| 3:2016cv06863 |
| November 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Del Norte |
| William H. Orrick |
| Environmental Matters |
| 16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER granting [ 1055 Stipulation extending motion deadlines. Responses due by 9/26/2022. Replies due by 11/9/2022. Motion Hearing set for 12/7/2022 02:00 PM via Videoconference Only before Judge Willam H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/08/2022. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2022)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER DENYING 101 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE JUDGMENT AND CLARIFYING INJUNCTION ORDERS by Judge William H. Orrick. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2018)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO ALTER BRIEFING SCHEDULE as to 101 MOTION for Relief from Judgment. Responses due by 3/23/2018. Replies due by 3/28/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/23/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2018)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER granting 87 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/03/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2017)
|
|
Filing
74
STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES granting 73 STIPULATION. Case Management Conference continued to 5/16/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 5/9/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/07/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2017)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 71 STIPULATION to Extend Responsive Pleading and Case Management Deadlines. Case Management Conference set for 5/16/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 5/9/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/31/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER MODIFYING 62 FEBRUARY 8, 2017 INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/24/2017. The Parties shall meet and confer in a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes that may arise relating to the Bureaus implementation of the surface flushing flows, deep flushing flows, and emergency dilution flows ordered herein, and/or the adaptive management process in paragraph 16, prior to seeking further intervention from this Court. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2017)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTIONS TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge William H. Orrick re: 42 Motion to Strike, 43 Motion for Joinder, 55 Motion for Leave to File, and 8 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court enters preliminary injunction. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2017)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 60 STIPULATION re To Extend Case Management Deadlines. Case Management Statement due by 5/2/2017. Case Management Conference continued to 5/2/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/03/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
