Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Yurok Tribe, et al v. Klamath Irrigation District, et al
as 23-15521
Plaintiff / Appellee: YUROK TRIBE, PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Counter Claimant: U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: KLAMATH TRIBES
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cross Defendant: OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Yurok Tribe, et al v. Klamath Water Users Association, et al
as 23-15499
Plaintiff / Appellee: YUROK TRIBE, PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Counter Claimant: U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: KLAMATH TRIBES and KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cross Defendant: OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Klamath Irrigation District v. USDC-ORM
as 22-70143
Not Classified By Court: In re: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT, U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Petitioner: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, MEDFORD
Yurok Tribe, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
as 22-15818
Plaintiff / Appellee: YUROK TRIBE, on its own behalf and on behalf of its members and FRANKIE MYERS, Yurok Tribal Council Vice Chairperson, in his official and individual capacities
Intervenor: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Klamath Irrigation District v. USDC-ORM
as 22-70052
Not Classified By Court: In re: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT, U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Petitioner: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, MEDFORD
Klamath Tribes v. United States Bureau of Reclamation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00556
Plaintiff: Klamath Tribes
Defendant: United States Bureau of Reclamation
Intervenor Defendant: Klamath Water Users Association
Amicus Curiae: Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermens Associations and Institute for Fisheries Resources
Intervenor: Klamath Irrigation District
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Klamath Irrigation District v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
as OR/1:21-CV-00504
Plaintiff: Klamath Irrigation District
Defendant: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
Klamath Irrigation District v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00504
Plaintiff: Klamath Irrigation District
Defendant: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
Intervenor Defendant: Oregon Water Resources Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shasta View Irrigation Distric, et al v. United States Bureau of Reclam, et al
as 20-36020
Plaintiff / Appellant: TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, ROB UNRUH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, BRENDA BURMAN, Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES
Plaintiff: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Klamath Irrigation District, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al
as 20-36009
Plaintiff: VAN BRIMMER DITCH COMPANY, SHASTA VIEW IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ROB UNRUH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, JEFFREY NETTLETON, in his official capacity as Area Manager for the Klamath Area Reclamation Office and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES
Plaintiff / Appellant: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?