Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Yurok Tribe, et al v. Klamath Irrigation District, et al
as 23-15521
Plaintiff / Appellee: YUROK TRIBE, PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Counter Claimant: U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: KLAMATH TRIBES
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cross Defendant: OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Yurok Tribe, et al v. Klamath Water Users Association, et al
as 23-15499
Plaintiff / Appellee: YUROK TRIBE, PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Counter Claimant: U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: KLAMATH TRIBES and KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cross Defendant: OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Klamath Tribes v. United States Bureau of Reclamation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00556
Plaintiff: Klamath Tribes
Defendant: United States Bureau of Reclamation
Intervenor Defendant: Klamath Water Users Association
Amicus Curiae: Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermens Associations and Institute for Fisheries Resources
Intervenor: Klamath Irrigation District
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Shasta View Irrigation Distric, et al v. United States Bureau of Reclam, et al
as 20-36020
Plaintiff / Appellant: TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, ROB UNRUH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, BRENDA BURMAN, Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES
Plaintiff: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Klamath Irrigation District, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al
as 20-36009
Plaintiff: VAN BRIMMER DITCH COMPANY, SHASTA VIEW IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ROB UNRUH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, JEFFREY NETTLETON, in his official capacity as Area Manager for the Klamath Area Reclamation Office and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES
Plaintiff / Appellant: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Tulelake Irrigation District, et al v. USFWS, et al
as 20-35515
Plaintiff / Appellant: TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, FOUR H ORGANICS, LLC, KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, PAUL SOUZA, his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest Region, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation and OREGON WILD, An Oregon nonprofit corporation
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35513
Plaintiff / Appellant: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL BYRNE, TALLY HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, DBA Walker Brothers, TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff: WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant: OREGON WILD, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation and AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: WOODHOUSE FARMING AND SEED COMPANY, TALLY HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, DBA Walker Brothers, MICHAEL BYRNE and others
Plaintiff: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35509
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL BYRNE, TALLY HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, DBA Walker Brothers, TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Shasta View Irrigation District v. United States Bureau of Reclamation
as 1:2019cv00531
Plaintiff: Van Brimmer Ditch Company, Shasta View Irrigation District, Rob Unruh and others
Defendant: Jeffrey Nettleton, Ernest Conant and United States Bureau of Reclamation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?