Juneja v. Pandey et al
| Ashwin Juneja |
| Ravi Mhatre, Louis J. Attanasio, David Sangster, Dheeraj Pandey, Susan L. Bostrom, John McAdam, Craig Conway, Tyler Wall, Nutanix, Inc, Michael P. Scarpelli, Kenneth W. Long, III, Steven J. Gomo, Jeffrey T. Parks, Duston M. Williams and Sudheesh N. Vadakkedath |
| 3:2019cv03821 |
| July 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| William H Orrick |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED ACTIONS AND APPOINT LEAD COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS by Judge William H. Orrick granting (29) Stipulation in case 3:19-cv-03817-WHO. Associated Cases: 3:19-cv-03817-WHO, 3:19-cv-03821-WHO (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2020)
|
| Filing 12 Case reassigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Judge Edward J. Davila no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2019) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF - The docket number for the Master File shall be No. 3:19-cv- 01651-WHO. .Signed by Judge William H. Orrick Any application for relief from this order should be filed by 8/30/2019. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2019) Modified on 8/20/2019 (cv, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 10 (Text Only) CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/15/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/24/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Hon. Edward J. Davila. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2019) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 7/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2019)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (pmc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2019) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ashwin Juneja.. (Sanders, Shane) (Filed on 7/15/2019) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2019) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/24/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/1/2019 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2019) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/15/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2019) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ashwin Juneja (Robbins, Brian) (Filed on 7/1/2019) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Robbins, Brian) (Filed on 7/1/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Louis J. Attanasio, Susan L. Bostrom, Craig Conway, Steven J. Gomo, Kenneth W. Long, III, John McAdam, Ravi Mhatre, Nutanix, Inc, Dheeraj Pandey, Jeffrey T. Parks, David Sangster, Michael P. Scarpelli, Sudheesh N. Vadakkedath, Tyler Wall, Duston M. Williams ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13482910.). Filed byAshwin Juneja. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Robbins, Brian) (Filed on 7/1/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
