Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Roy v. Narayen et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, John Murphy, Daniel Durn and others
Gervat v. Narayen et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse Brett Biggs, Melanie Boulden and others
Shah v. Narayen et al
as 1:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse, Brett Biggs and others
Nominal Defendant:
Adobe Inc.
John P. Norton, on behalf of the Norton Family Living Trust UAD 11/15/02 v. Nutanix, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv04080
Defendant:
Duston M. Williams, Dheeraj Pandey and Nutanix, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John P. Norton, on behalf of the Norton Family Living Trust UAD
Bhonagiri v. Pandey et al
as 5:2019cv03817
Plaintiff:
Aravind Bhonagiri
Defendant:
Ravi Mhatre, Louis J. Attanasio, David Sangster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juneja v. Pandey et al
as 3:2019cv03821
Defendant:
Ravi Mhatre, Louis J. Attanasio, David Sangster and others
Plaintiff:
Ashwin Juneja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zapf v. Nutanix, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02781
Defendant:
Duston M. Williams, Dheeraj Pandey and Nutanix, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Heidi Zapf
Petitioner:
Frank H. May
Maroun v. Nutanix, Inc et al
as 3:2019cv02744
Plaintiff:
Joseph S. Maroun
Defendant:
Nutanix, Inc, Dheeraj Pandey and Duston M. Williams
Petitioner:
Frank H. May
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Mauter v. Nutanix, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02442
Plaintiff:
Tim Mauter
Defendant:
Duston M. Williams, Nutanix, Inc. and Dheeraj Pandey
Petitioner:
Frank H. May
Scheller v. Nutanix, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01651
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scheller, Bristol County Retirement System and Joseph S. Maroun
Defendant:
Duston M. Williams, Nutanix, Inc. and Dheeraj Pandey
Petitioner:
David Panczner, City of Birmingham Relief and Retirement System, Ronald Castillo and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
