Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bushansky v. Ramaswami et al
as 3:2023cv02203
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Rajiv Ramaswami, Craig Conway, Max de Groen and others
Bhonagiri v. Pandey et al
as 5:2019cv03817
Plaintiff:
Aravind Bhonagiri
Defendant:
Ravi Mhatre, Louis J. Attanasio, David Sangster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juneja v. Pandey et al
as 3:2019cv03821
Defendant:
Ravi Mhatre, Louis J. Attanasio, David Sangster and others
Plaintiff:
Ashwin Juneja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Liddell v. New Jersey Department of Corre, et al
as 16-3571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS LIDDELL
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner, BERNARD GOODWIN, ADMINISTRATOR and others
LIDDELL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2012cv02669
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LIDDELL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE HAYMAN, BERNARD GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard Bondurant v. Chris Christie
as 12-2137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD BONDURANT
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GARY M. LANIGAN, Commissioner of D.O.C., JENNIFER VELEZ, Esq., Commissioner of D.H.S. and others
SCOTT v. CONWAY et al
as 1:2011cv06095
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOTT
Defendant:
CRAIG CONWAY, ADULT DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siebenthal v. Innovative Environmental Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv61830
Plaintiff:
Leonard Siebenthal
Defendant:
Innovative Environmental Services, Inc. and Craig Conway
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Michael Keith Capers v. State of NJ, et al
as 11-2202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH CAPERS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ and CRAIG CONWAY
CAPERS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010cv01644
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KEITH CAPERS
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and CRAIG CONWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
