Badwi v. Evans et al
| Ramzi Ahmed Badwi |
| Evans, Moore, G. Lews, Charles Lee, Bowman, Kumar, O. Yarzabal, Kessler and Kates |
| 4:2008cv02221 |
| April 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition Office |
| Monterey |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 6/21/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER requiring parties to meet and confer re settlement. Telephonic status conference set for 6/12/2012 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 205, 2nd Floor, Eureka before Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 06/06/2012. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2012)
|
|
Filing
110
WRIT of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for presence of Plaintiff at settlement conference.Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 5/16/12. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2012)
|
|
Filing
109
WRIT of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for attendance of Plaintiff at settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 5/10/12. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 88 Motion for Leave to File (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2012)
|
|
Filing
101
NOTICE OF REFERRAL FOR DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/19/2012. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2012)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 35 Motion to Dismiss (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2012)
|
|
Filing
96
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 88 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Ramzi Ahmed Badwi, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 88 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Replies due by 2/24/2012.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/10/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/13/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 48 Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Opposition due by 10/07/2011. Defendants' Replies due (7) seven-days after Plaintiffs Opposition has been filed. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 07/27/11 (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2011) Modified on 7/29/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 44 Stipulation to Change Time of Settlement Conference to at least 08/15/11. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 3/30/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011) Modified on 7/1/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
33
ORDE REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Settlement. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/23/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG terminating 22 Motion ; denying 25 Motion for Settlement; granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2011)
|
|
Filing
24
WRIT of ad testificandum issued for attendance of plaintiff at settlement conference at Solano State Prison on April 20, 2011. Signed by Judge Vadas on 03/18/2011. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER OF SERVICE, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Settlement. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/10/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
